Hi, > >> > > Apr 21 10:58:24 xavier postfix-out/local[2682940]: 19D63305F4A09: > >> > > to=<bcc-u...@example.com>, relay=local, delay=0.01, delays=0.01/0/0/0, > >> > > dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to command: /usr/bin/procmail) > > it was delivered - what's the problem? > > >> > If you are running amavis as a content filter, you need the initial > >> > postfix instance (which feeds into amavis) to have > >> > > >> > receive_override_options = no_address_mappings > >> > > >> > and then permit mappings (which include always_bcc) to occur in the 2nd > >> > instance (for the mail that is returned by amavis), for example this > >> > might be in master.cf by: > >> > > >> > 127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n - - smtpd > >> > # note: absence of no_address_mappings means that address mapping > >> > *will* occur here, including always_bcc > >> > -o receive_override_options=no_unknown_recipient_checks,no_milters > >> > ... > >> > >> Okay, got it, thanks. This is now what I currently have: > >> > >> 127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n - 16 smtpd > >> -o content_filter= > >> -o smtpd_delay_reject=no > >> -o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,reject > >> -o smtpd_helo_restrictions= > >> -o smtpd_sender_restrictions= > >> -o smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,reject > >> -o smtpd_data_restrictions=reject_unauth_pipelining > >> -o smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions= > >> -o smtpd_restriction_classes= > >> -o mynetworks=127.0.0.0/8,209.111.90.0/24,209.222.85.153/29 > >> -o smtpd_error_sleep_time=0 > >> -o smtpd_soft_error_limit=1001 > >> -o smtpd_hard_error_limit=1000 > >> -o smtpd_client_connection_count_limit=0 > >> -o smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit=0 > >> -o > >> receive_override_options=no_header_body_checks,no_unknown_recipient_checks,no_milters,no_address_mappings > >> -o local_header_rewrite_clients= > > I recomment doing no_address_mappings on port 10025 when receiving mail from > amavis, and not globally in the main.cf. > > On 21.04.21 12:49, Alex wrote: > >This actually doesn't appear to have made any difference. What could I > >be doing wrong? > > what difference? What are you trying to do and what does it do you don't > expect/want ?
I should have made that more clear. The problem is that I'm trying to create an address to which amavisd should forward all mail unfiltered, but it only works if either all addresses are included in the policy or the unfiltered address is the only address. For example: @spam_lovers_maps = ( ['a...@example.com'] ); @bypass_spam_checks_maps = ( ['a...@example.com'] ); Also, we have a set of scripts that parse the log output and it's being impacted by this bcc-user address. This also means that any mail quarantined by amavisd for the recipient is also quarantined for the bcc-user. Thanks, Alex
