On Friday 18 February 2005 08:52, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> another significant use of high power processors is video encoding.   I do
> this more than occasionallly albeit not full time, and my 2,5Ghz P4 isn't
> fast enough for me...  encoding a DVD from a hour of editted camcorder
> footage can take 3-4 hours on my system
>
Yeah, well, until all the processing that anyone could possibly want to do 
can be done in a picosecond or two, there will always be people crying for 
more power. I'd like to LL test 2^(2^24036583-1)-1 ... and even if I could do 
that in a fraction of a second then I guess I'd be able to find even bigger 
Mersenne primes. (Before anyone points out that fitting the work vectors into 
the physical universe would be a more than trivial problem, I'm well aware)

If encoding a DVD takes hours, then surely the sensible thing to do is to run 
it in background (batch) mode. At which point it's more or less irrelevant if 
it takes 3-4 hours or 8 - just leave it running overnight ... the point being 
that a 25 GHz P4 is still going to take longer than you'd be prepared to sit 
waiting for. Besides which, by the time 25 GHz processors are common, you'll 
be taking 10x as long to encode video as you'll be demanding several times 
the resolution.

Most people, most of the time, do nothing more demanding than rendering web 
pages, encoding and decoding music & still photos. 1 GHz processors are quite 
sufficient to do that. My guess is that, given realistic marketing of the 
benefits of lower power systems in terms of lower noise output and reduced 
utility bills, the CPU speed numbers game would practically die out overnight.

Except amongst hardcore games freaks, and a small minority of users with 
particular requirements e.g. processing digital images made by 
high-resolution scanning from medium-format film, which can easily be 100x 
the size of the images typically captured by consumer digicams. As well as 
Mersenne testers ;)

Regards
Brian Beesley
_______________________________________________
Prime mailing list
[email protected]
http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime

Reply via email to