On 8/2/07, Dave Crozier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> In my lay mans terms, what I'd really like to do is leave the clients so
> they automatically are set up without having to manually set gateways/DNS
> and then set up the Server to route all the Internet requests through itself
> to the router.

That's not at all an unreasonable request, and millions of networks
work that way. I'm afraid I can't provide you with step-by-step
instructions, but I have to think the right Google query should find
what you want.

> As the owner of the network said, if the Router dies then all his network
> would die as it couldn't allocate IP addresses to the workstations, whereas
> if the Server runs DHCP then they would still be up and running. Also
> maintenance would all be at one point in the network and I think he's got a
> valid point there.

What's more likely to fail? A $49 router with no moving parts that can
be rebooted in 15 seconds out of FlashRAM, or a $2000 Windows server
with moving parts, lowest-bidder components and _Windows_
forgodsakes!_ How many automatic updates and "Windows Genuine
Advantage" tests are you going to succeed with?

"Maintenance would all be at one point in the network" is referred to
by disaster recovery specialists as a "Single Point of Failure." Why
set yourself up for a SPOF?

A much better disaster recovery plan is to keep a spare $49 router
about, pre-configured and ready to drop-in.

-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to