On Saturday 05 April 2008 19:34, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > Why not use the traditional criminal justice system to determine guilt.
Hi Leland! Because these are not traditional criminals, to begin with. They bore arms against the United States, were captured in so doing but they were by no means part of an "army" - no uniforms and no traditional chain of command leading to a clearly defined enemy organization. It may be that we don't know what to do with them, but they are not traditional criminals, that is for sure. It may be that there are no laws to try them under, but they have proven themselves enemies and a threat of continued danger. It would be irresponsible to give them any kind of trial or to let them go while the hostilities remain active. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
