Ricardo Araoz wrote:
> Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
>   
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>     
>>> Leland wrote:
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> A rose by any other name is still a rose, and a concentration camp by 
>>>> any other name, (eg interment camp), is still a concentration camp.  
>>>> Many people who were classified as enemy combatant and place in the 
>>>> Guantanamo interment camp have been there for years and under the 
>>>> current patriot act and other new laws that trump the American 
>>>> Constitution, can be held their forever with no requirement to bring 
>>>> charges, no hearings, no habeas corpus, and no trail by jury or any 
>>>> other kind of constitutional due process, etc, and so I think 
>>>> concentration camps are just plan wrong and very Anti-American.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> It's thinking like that that gets innocent people killed.  If you would 
>>> like to take responsibility for one, perhaps they can house one in your 
>>> house.  It's hard for Americans to comprehend the hatred and fanaticism of 
>>> some of these people.  Would you prefer we just take them out and shoot 
>>> them?
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> Why not use the traditional criminal justice system to determine guilt.  
>> If they are found guilty of a capital offense, they should receive life 
>> in prison.  If they are found to be guilty of a lessor crime, they 
>> should sever time in prison.  If they are found to be innocent of any 
>> crime, return them to the point from where they were taken.  This 
>> shouldn't overwhelm the criminal justice system; because, it is my 
>> understanding there are only about 500 prisoners being held in Guantanamo.
>>
>> The prisoners being held at Guantanamo are no more danger than many 
>> prisoner being held on death row today, and to think of them as some 
>> kind of especially dangerous Supermen requiring handling under special 
>> laws is the real danger.
>>
>> I say this should all be handled in the traditional American way, (eg 
>> Constitutionally), including the issue of immigration.  The USA has been 
>> headed in a dangerous direction ever since 9/11.  If this continues, 
>> America will wake up in a generation, or two generation at most, from 
>> now in a completely different world.  It will be a world that  knows 
>> nothing of Democracy or Constitutional guarantees to privacy, freedom, 
>> and due process.  The American way that we knew just a few six or seven 
>> years ago will be gone forever, unless we change direction back to the 
>> foundations upon which the USA was built.
>>
>>     
>
> What a dumb little minded comment. As if USA would be the whole world. 
> Got news for you pal! There are many places where we have democracy and 
> held civil rights higher than in your shitty little country. Places 
> where ABSOLUTELY NO constitutionally elected president has been MURDERED.
>
>   
Have you been drinking?  I read your post, but your thoughts seem to be 
breaking up.  I'm having trouble making anything out of them.

Perhaps you could point to the exactly phrase you considered "dumb 
little minded comment", and examples of the many places we (eg It would 
be interesting to know exactly what the pronoun "we" refers to) have 
democracy and held civil rights higher than in your shitty little 
country. LOL

Regards,

LelandJ

>   Perhaps you could provide what you judged to be "dumb little minded 
> comment", and the many places where we (eg It would be interesting to know 
> exactly what the pronoum "we" refers to)
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to