By the way, is there a convention on this forum for hiding spoilers in
posts?


On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Thomas Costigliola <[email protected]>wrote:

> Got it now. But I still need some rest to really understand it.
>
> Here is more weirdness:
>
>    1 2 ]@v 1 2 3
> 2 3
> 3 4
> 4 5
>    1 2 v 1 2 3
> |length error: v
> |   1 2     v 1 2 3
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> yes.
>>
>> It's not a special-code trick.  v is a verb.  ] could be anything, and
>> the same weirdness would result.
>>
>>    1 2 v 2 3
>> 3 5
>>    1 2 (v) 2 3
>> 3 5
>>    1 2 ]@v 2 3
>> 3 4
>> 4 5
>>    1 2 ]@(v) 2 3
>> 3 4
>> 4 5
>>
>>
>> Henry Rich
>>
>>
>> On 6/7/2013 6:43 PM, Dan Bron wrote:
>>
>>> My question #2 had two clauses with opposite senses (i.e. it was an
>>> either/or question), so an unqualified "no" is an ambiguous response.  Let
>>> me phrase it as a strict yes/no question:
>>>
>>> Does  x ]@(v) y necessarily produce the same result as x ]@v y ?
>>>
>>> I'm trying to prune out lines of inquiry which would be unsurprising or
>>> at least mundane. Since adverbs can see their entire verbal argument,
>>> phrases like ]@+/ and ]@(+/) are fundamentally different, even if they
>>> produce the same results when applied to arguments. In short, if my v is
>>> given access to the ]@ then all sorts of doors are opened (this is actually
>>> how most special code is implemented) and the puzzle is not so interesting.
>>>
>>>
>>> If, on the other hand, we're taking about a ]@(v) which differs from
>>> plain (v), that is very interesting; and if the DoJ does in fact legitimize
>>> it (or at least fail to prohibit it), then it is fascinating!
>>>
>>> -Dan
>>>
>>> Please excuse typos; composed on a handheld device.
>>>
>>> On Jun 7, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>  1 yes; 2 no; 3 not exactly specified; guess incorrect
>>>>
>>>> Henry Rich
>>>>
>>>> On 6/7/2013 4:36 PM, Dan Bron wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Three questions:
>>>>>
>>>>>     #1  Is v necessarily a verb?
>>>>>     #2  Does the effect depend upon v being anonymous, or will it work
>>>>> if v is assigned to a name and/or wrapped in parens?
>>>>>     #3  Is the effect indicated, contraindicated, or unspecified by the
>>>>> Dictionary?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Dan
>>>>>
>>>>> PS:  My initial guess is this is almost certainly a bug introduced by
>>>>> some
>>>>> special-code optimization.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: 
>>>>> programming-bounces@forums.**jsoftware.com<[email protected]>
>>>>> [mailto:programming-bounces@**forums.jsoftware.com<[email protected]>]
>>>>> On Behalf Of Henry Rich
>>>>> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 3:14 PM
>>>>> To: Programming forum
>>>>> Subject: [Jprogramming] A puzzle
>>>>>
>>>>> For what sort of v does
>>>>>
>>>>>     ]@v
>>>>>
>>>>> give different results than
>>>>>
>>>>>     v
>>>>>
>>>>> ?  No side effects.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>      1 2 v 1 2
>>>>> 2 4
>>>>>      1 2 ]@v 1 2
>>>>> 2 3
>>>>> 3 4
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Henry Rich
>>>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>>>>> ----------
>>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/**
>>>>> forums.htm <http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>>>>> ----------
>>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/**
>>>>> forums.htm <http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm>
>>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>>>> ----------
>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/**
>>>> forums.htm <http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm>
>>>>
>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>>> ----------
>>> For information about J forums see 
>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/**forums.htm<http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm>
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>> ----------
>> For information about J forums see 
>> http://www.jsoftware.com/**forums.htm<http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm>
>>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to