Yes, I meant, as in the original problem stated by Henry, v to have no side effects.
I am thinking I have a reason it is not impossible but I should double check my logic before posting for once. On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Thomas Costigliola <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Can you write v such that > > > > 0 = (v i.2 3) -: (]&v i.2 3) > > v=: ? > > Or, if you prefer: > > STATE=:0 > v=:3 :0 > STATE=: STATE+1 > ) > > But if you also require > 0 = (v i.2 3) -: (v i.2 3) > > ...that would be a different problem. > > -- > Raul > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
