Atau anjing2 buduk yang busuk2 ingin membusukkan Islam ?
Yah seekor anjing sepertimu memang mendingan gonggong terus lah.

--- In proletar@yahoogroups.com, item abu <itemabu@...> wrote:
>
> Apa orang Islam ngamuk krn film itu ngehina Islam atau orang Islam ngamuk krn 
> film itu ngebongkar kebusukan Islam?
> 
> 
> 
> http://islam-watch.org/authors/138-jake-neuman/1150-innocence-of-muslims-a-disgusting-despicable-reprehensible-offensive-movie.html
> 
> ‘Innocence of Muslims’: A Disgusting, Despicable, Reprehensible, 
> Offensive Movie? 
> Monday, 17 September 2012 04:22  Jake Neuman
> 
> 
> Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has called the movie, Innocence of 
> Muslims, "disgusting and reprehensible", "inflammable and despicable"?
> 
> Is that so? I guess it is. After 
> watching the movie, I too found it disgusting, despicable, reprehensible and 
> offensive. Although this is no academy award winning movie to say 
> the least, the acts of Muhammad as seen in the movie are indeed 
> horrifying. The only thing Clinton didn't probably realize is that the 
> movie, disgusting and horrifying as it is, is a rather a true portrayal 
> of the life of Prophet Muhammad, a monster of history.
>  
> 
> 1)  The movie would arouse disgust for 
> the way Muhammad is shown to murder Jewish chieftain Kinana of Khayber 
> in front of his 17-year-old wife, then taking her as his sex-slave. But 
> that was a fact as sacred Islamic texts tell us. In fact, Kinana was 
> tortured by setting a fire on his chest to force him to reveal the 
> location of the treasure under his care, and after the treasure was 
> found, he was murdered by beheading. But in the movie, Muhammad’s 
> cruelty is somewhat softened by simply showing Kinanah being killed by 
> stab on the neck with a sword. Of course, Kinana’s beautiful young wife 
> Safiyah taken to bed by Muhammad and raped on the same night. Here is 
> the story (Sahi Buchari Hadith #143, page-700):
> 
> “Sulaiman Ibne 
> Harb… Aannas Ibn Malek (ra) narrated, “in the war of Khayber after the 
> inhabitants of Banu Nadir were surrendered, Allah’s apostle killed all 
> the able/adult men, and he (prophet) took all women and children as 
> captives... Among the captives Safiyya Bint Huyy Akhtab was taken by 
> Allah’s Apostle as booty whom He married after freeing her and her 
> freedom was her Mahr.”
> 
> For a man, believed to be the final and 
> finest prophet of God by the world’s 1.6 billion Muslims, committing 
> murder of a man in such barbaric manner and then raping the poor man’s 
> wife on the same night is despicable and reprehensible indeed, probably 
> more than that.
> 
> 2)  The movie also shows the Prophet of 
> Islam murdering a 120-year-old woman by tearing her apart by camels for 
> daring to defy him. Nothing could be more disgusting and horrifying that 
> this. But that’s what happened in reality as sacred Islamic texts 
> inform us. Here’s the story from al-Tabari, VIII:96:
> 
> "A raiding party led by Zayd set out against Umm in Ramadan. During it, Umm 
> suffered a cruel death. Zyad tied her legs with rope and then tied her 
> between two 
> camels until they split her in two. She was a very old woman. Then they 
> brought Umm's daughter and Abdallah to the Messenger. Umm's daughter 
> belonged to Salamah who had captured her. Muhammad asked Salamah for 
> her, and Salamah gave her to him."
> 
> 3)  Mrs. Clinton should be commended for calling the movie disgusting, 
> despicable, reprehensible and offensive, 
> given it shows Prophet Muhammad lusting for his adopted son's wife, and 
> abolishing the noble tradition of adoption forever in Islam in order to 
> marry her. The fact is: This is also what happened in reality, and 
> that’s what should be deemed disgusting and horrifying. Here’s the 
> story:
> 
> The name of Muhammad’s adopted son was 
> Zayd bin Harithah, who, upon adoption by pagan Muhammad ca. 696 AD, 
> became Zayd bin Muhammad. Zayd’s wife was Zaynab bint Jahsh. The Arabs 
> regarded an adopted son as their son. Thus, sexual relations with the 
> wife of someone’s adopted son was deemed incest and disgusting. However, 
> when Muhammad took Zaynab as his wife, raising disgust and criticism 
> amongst the Arabs, he came up with a solution to kill the criticism, at 
> least within his own community, by banning the noble custom of adoption 
> in Islam. So, he brought out the following verse (Quran 33:37):
> 
> “And when thou 
> saidst unto him on whom Allah hath conferred favour and thou hast 
> conferred favour: Keep thy wife to thyself, and fear Allah. And thou 
> didst hide in thy mind that which Allah was to bring to light, and thou 
> didst fear mankind whereas Allah hath a better right that thou shouldst 
> fear Him. So when Zeyd had performed that necessary formality (of 
> divorce) from her, We gave her unto thee in marriage, so that 
> (henceforth) there may be no sin for believers in respect of wives of 
> their adopted sons, when the latter have performed the necessary 
> formality (of release) from them. The commandment of Allah must be 
> fulfilled.”
> 
> In the verse, Islamic God states that 
> this revelation is not to apply only to the case faced by Muhammad, but 
> for the Muslim community at all times. Therefore, by bringing in this 
> verse, Muhammad not only destroyed a very noble age-old Arab custom, but also 
> legalized his lust for his daughter-in-law, which the Muslim 
> society can practice for eternity. Disgusting indeed!
> 
> 4)  The movie shows the prophet of Islam ordering Jews and Christians to 
> convert to Islam or pay the jiza tax 
> (extortion) or be murdered. And it should be called disgusting, 
> despicable, reprehensible and offensive, because that is what happened 
> in reality. This is what the Islamic God says about it in the Quran 
> (9:29):
> 
> “Fight those who do 
> not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what 
> Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out 
> of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in 
> acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.”
> 
> 5)  The movie shows the prophet of Islam ordering his followers to murder 
> kafir men, enslave their their women 
> and children, sell the elderly women and children for horses, camels and arms 
> for future war and use the younger captive women as sex-slaves. 
> Nothing can be more disgusting, despicable, reprehensible and offensive 
> than this. And the sad thing is: that is exactly what happened as sacred 
> Islamic scriptures and texts inform us:
> 
>       * Quran 8:41: “And know that      out of all the booty that ye may 
> acquire (in war), a fifth share is      assigned to Allah, - and to the 
> Messenger, and to near relatives, orphans,      the needy, and the 
> wayfarer, - if ye do believe in Allah and in the      revelation We sent down 
> to Our servant on the Day of Testing, - the Day of      the 
> meeting of the two forces. For Allah hath power over all things.”
> 
> Quran 33:27: “And He made you heirs of their lands, their houses, and  
>     their goods, and of a land which ye had not frequented (before). And
>  Allah      has power over all things.” [Merciful Allah asked Prophet 
> Muhammad to      confiscate entire properties of surrendered Jews] (Banu
>  Qurayza)
>       * 
> 
>       * Quran 8:67: “It is not for      any prophet to have captives until 
> he hath made slaughter in the land. Ye      desire the lure of this 
> world and Allah desireth (for you) the Hereafter,      and Allah is 
> Mighty, Wise.”  (Allah      insisting Prophet to kill all the prisoners, 
> and should not keep any      surrendered prisoners alive until He 
> (Prophet) occupied entire Arabia.
>       * 
> 
>       * Quran 8:17: “It is not ye who      Slew them; it is God; when thou 
> threwest a handful of dust, it was not Thy      act, but God’s…..” 
> (Allah said, the killing of surrendered soldiers were      done by the 
> wish of Allah)
> 
> There are many more things in the movie, shown to be committed by the prophet 
> of Islam, will be found 
> disgusting, despicable, reprehensible and offensive by civilized people. But 
> the sad reality is also that those are no fictions if the Quran, 
> hadiths and biographies of Prophet Muhammad, which have been held as the 
> sacred texts of Islam by Muslims for the past 1400+ years, are to be 
> believed in. And the movie should be deemed truly disgusting, 
> despicable, reprehensible and offensive, because such horrifying 
> atrocities and immoralities were committed by the prophet of Islam, 
> thereby perpetuating in Islamic societies.
> 
> In sum: Yes, Hillary is correct. This 
> movie is disgusting, despicable, and reprehensible. And despite poor 
> production, Mrs Clinton and every American, indeed all civilized people 
> of the world, should watch it and condemn the fact that Muhammad 
> committed those barbaric atrocities and immoralities. Civilized people 
> of the world must also unite in condemnation of the Muslim Brotherhood, 
> Egyptian President Mursi, and the wider Muslim community for not 
> condemning those horrible and immoral actions of their prophet. They 
> should be condemned even more strongly for not only attacking the movie 
> despite true portrayal of the life of Muhammad, but for inciting the 
> Muslim masses for attacking American embassies and killing Americans, 
> who had absolutely nothing to do with the making of the movie. It’s also 
> unfortunate, if not disgusting, that President Obama and Hillary 
> Clinton, as if in compliance with the Sharia Law, asked Google to review its 
> policies regarding the movie, that is, telling Google to shut down 
> the Youtube sites showing the movie, thereby violating the First 
> Amendment of the US Constitution.
> 
> ---
> 
> Jake Neuman is the author of “Islam and Sharia Law Are Treason: Jihad Is 
> Treason” and “Prophet Muhammad (AKA ALLAH): Monster of History.” (free 
> download)
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>




------------------------------------

Post message: prole...@egroups.com
Subscribe   :  proletar-subscr...@egroups.com
Unsubscribe :  proletar-unsubscr...@egroups.com
List owner  :  proletar-ow...@egroups.com
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    proletar-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    proletar-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    proletar-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to