Pulp2 tag sounds great to me. On Fri, Apr 12, 2019, 16:23 Brian Bouterse <bbout...@redhat.com> wrote:
> +1 to making a 'Pulp 2' tag > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:16 PM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> I’ve been thinking through this and I think there are 3 steps to perform: >> >> 1. Create a Pulp 2 tag >> 2. Assign the Pulp 2 tag to issues not tagged with Pulp 3 >> 3. Remove the Pulp 3 tag >> >> Does that make sense? If so, I’d like to perform 1 and create the Pulp 2 >> tag in the next few days so we can start adding it to issues. >> >> I’ll follow up with more concrete plans for steps 2 and 3 next week. >> >> David >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:10 AM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Cool, I will try to think through how to transition and we can discuss >>> at the team meeting Monday. >>> >>> David >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:04 AM Ina Panova <ipan...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 to create a pulp2 tag after mass-close >>>> >>>> >>>> -------- >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Ina Panova >>>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. >>>> >>>> "Do not go where the path may lead, >>>> go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 3:48 PM Brian Bouterse <bbout...@redhat.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Great idea David! >>>>> >>>>> Once we get through tomorrow's mass-close, let's plan a transition to >>>>> remove the Pulp3 tag and introduce a Pulp 2 tag instead. >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:34 AM Dana Walker <dawal...@redhat.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Dana Walker >>>>>> >>>>>> Software Engineer >>>>>> >>>>>> Red Hat >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://www.redhat.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:22 AM Daniel Alley <dal...@redhat.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I feel like using the Pulp 3 tag is suboptimal since we are closing >>>>>>>> out most of our Pulp 2 issues and a majority of the new >>>>>>>> bugs/tasks/stories >>>>>>>> are for Pulp 3. Wouldn’t it make more sense to create a Pulp 2 tag and >>>>>>>> use >>>>>>>> it on the rare Pulp 2 issues that get filed? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Agreed, +1 to having a "Pulp 2" tag to replace the Pulp 3 tag. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:19 AM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I feel like using the Pulp 3 tag is suboptimal since we are closing >>>>>>>> out most of our Pulp 2 issues and a majority of the new >>>>>>>> bugs/tasks/stories >>>>>>>> are for Pulp 3. Wouldn’t it make more sense to create a Pulp 2 tag and >>>>>>>> use >>>>>>>> it on the rare Pulp 2 issues that get filed? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> David >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 8:27 AM Ina Panova <ipan...@redhat.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 to handle tag during the triage process >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -------- >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ina Panova >>>>>>>>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Do not go where the path may lead, >>>>>>>>> go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:53 PM Brian Bouterse <bbout...@redhat.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 to Tanya's suggestion. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Also I have an action item to start a separate thread on how we >>>>>>>>>> can plan-and-then-close all pulp2 bugs that we are not actively >>>>>>>>>> working on. >>>>>>>>>> I wanted to mention it here to identify it as a possible resolution >>>>>>>>>> to this >>>>>>>>>> issue since it was related. I'll send this today. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:54 AM Tatiana Tereshchenko < >>>>>>>>>> ttere...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In my opinion, it's a part of triage or grooming process. >>>>>>>>>>> Triage leader (for issues) and a person who grooms the task >>>>>>>>>>> should pay attention to the tags. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Tanya >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:47 PM David Davis < >>>>>>>>>>> davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Looking in redmine at our current sprint, I see several issues >>>>>>>>>>>> that don’t have Pulp 3 tag that should. Here are some: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4587 >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4587> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4595 >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4595> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4577 >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4577> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4576 >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4576> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4545 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4545>Talking with the QE team, >>>>>>>>>>>> it’s difficult for them to get a feel for how much Pulp 2 vs Pulp >>>>>>>>>>>> 3 work >>>>>>>>>>>> there is. I guess we could try to get better about tagging issues >>>>>>>>>>>> when we >>>>>>>>>>>> create them? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> However, at least one issue is by someone outside the core Pulp >>>>>>>>>>>> team and I am not sure community members will know to tag their >>>>>>>>>>>> issues w/ >>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp 3 tag. Are there any other alternatives to ensuring Pulp 3 >>>>>>>>>>>> issues get >>>>>>>>>>>> properly tagged? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> David >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev