Curiosity question - what we will benefit from removing tags Pulp 3, Pulp 3 MVP, and Pulp 3 RC Blocker? Except of tons notifications received? I would keep them on the issues as they are, for historical reasons of pulp3 development.
-------- Regards, Ina Panova Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. "Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 10:18 PM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: > The Pulp 2 tag has been created in redmine. Please start using it to tag > issues that apply to Pulp 2. We’re also applying the new Pulp 2 tag to > issues without the Pulp 3 tag in the following projects in redmine: > > Debian > Crane > Docker > Nectar > OSTree > Packaging > Pulp > Puppet > Python > RPM > > This includes about 1161 issues. Please let us know if there are any > issues that shouldn’t be tagged or ones we have missed. > > The final step which we hope to do on Wednesday will be to remove the > tags: Pulp 3, Pulp 3 MVP, and Pulp 3 RC Blocker. We’ll make csv backups for > each before we remove them. > > David > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 2:52 PM Mike DePaulo <mikedep...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> +1 to the "Pulp 2" tag. >> (I was just thinking this.) >> >> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 4:28 PM Austin Macdonald <amacd...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Pulp2 tag sounds great to me. >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019, 16:23 Brian Bouterse <bbout...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 to making a 'Pulp 2' tag >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:16 PM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I’ve been thinking through this and I think there are 3 steps to >>>>> perform: >>>>> >>>>> 1. Create a Pulp 2 tag >>>>> 2. Assign the Pulp 2 tag to issues not tagged with Pulp 3 >>>>> 3. Remove the Pulp 3 tag >>>>> >>>>> Does that make sense? If so, I’d like to perform 1 and create the Pulp >>>>> 2 tag in the next few days so we can start adding it to issues. >>>>> >>>>> I’ll follow up with more concrete plans for steps 2 and 3 next week. >>>>> >>>>> David >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:10 AM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Cool, I will try to think through how to transition and we can >>>>>> discuss at the team meeting Monday. >>>>>> >>>>>> David >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:04 AM Ina Panova <ipan...@redhat.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 to create a pulp2 tag after mass-close >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -------- >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ina Panova >>>>>>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Do not go where the path may lead, >>>>>>> go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 3:48 PM Brian Bouterse <bbout...@redhat.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Great idea David! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Once we get through tomorrow's mass-close, let's plan a transition >>>>>>>> to remove the Pulp3 tag and introduce a Pulp 2 tag instead. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:34 AM Dana Walker <dawal...@redhat.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Dana Walker >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Software Engineer >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Red Hat >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <https://www.redhat.com> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:22 AM Daniel Alley <dal...@redhat.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I feel like using the Pulp 3 tag is suboptimal since we are >>>>>>>>>>> closing out most of our Pulp 2 issues and a majority of the new >>>>>>>>>>> bugs/tasks/stories are for Pulp 3. Wouldn’t it make more sense to >>>>>>>>>>> create a >>>>>>>>>>> Pulp 2 tag and use it on the rare Pulp 2 issues that get filed? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Agreed, +1 to having a "Pulp 2" tag to replace the Pulp 3 tag. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:19 AM David Davis < >>>>>>>>>> davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I feel like using the Pulp 3 tag is suboptimal since we are >>>>>>>>>>> closing out most of our Pulp 2 issues and a majority of the new >>>>>>>>>>> bugs/tasks/stories are for Pulp 3. Wouldn’t it make more sense to >>>>>>>>>>> create a >>>>>>>>>>> Pulp 2 tag and use it on the rare Pulp 2 issues that get filed? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> David >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 8:27 AM Ina Panova <ipan...@redhat.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to handle tag during the triage process >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -------- >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ina Panova >>>>>>>>>>>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Do not go where the path may lead, >>>>>>>>>>>> go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:53 PM Brian Bouterse < >>>>>>>>>>>> bbout...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to Tanya's suggestion. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Also I have an action item to start a separate thread on how >>>>>>>>>>>>> we can plan-and-then-close all pulp2 bugs that we are not >>>>>>>>>>>>> actively working >>>>>>>>>>>>> on. I wanted to mention it here to identify it as a possible >>>>>>>>>>>>> resolution to >>>>>>>>>>>>> this issue since it was related. I'll send this today. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:54 AM Tatiana Tereshchenko < >>>>>>>>>>>>> ttere...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In my opinion, it's a part of triage or grooming process. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Triage leader (for issues) and a person who grooms the task >>>>>>>>>>>>>> should pay attention to the tags. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tanya >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:47 PM David Davis < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looking in redmine at our current sprint, I see several >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues that don’t have Pulp 3 tag that should. Here are some: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4587 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4587> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4595 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4595> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4577 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4577> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4576 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4576> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4545 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4545>Talking with the QE team, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it’s difficult for them to get a feel for how much Pulp 2 vs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp 3 work >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is. I guess we could try to get better about tagging >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues when we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create them? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, at least one issue is by someone outside the core >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp team and I am not sure community members will know to tag >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their issues >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> w/ Pulp 3 tag. Are there any other alternatives to ensuring >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp 3 issues >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get properly tagged? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
