+1 to the "Pulp 2" tag. (I was just thinking this.) On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 4:28 PM Austin Macdonald <amacd...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Pulp2 tag sounds great to me. > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019, 16:23 Brian Bouterse <bbout...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> +1 to making a 'Pulp 2' tag >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:16 PM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I’ve been thinking through this and I think there are 3 steps to perform: >>> >>> 1. Create a Pulp 2 tag >>> 2. Assign the Pulp 2 tag to issues not tagged with Pulp 3 >>> 3. Remove the Pulp 3 tag >>> >>> Does that make sense? If so, I’d like to perform 1 and create the Pulp 2 >>> tag in the next few days so we can start adding it to issues. >>> >>> I’ll follow up with more concrete plans for steps 2 and 3 next week. >>> >>> David >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:10 AM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Cool, I will try to think through how to transition and we can discuss >>>> at the team meeting Monday. >>>> >>>> David >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:04 AM Ina Panova <ipan...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 to create a pulp2 tag after mass-close >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -------- >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Ina Panova >>>>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. >>>>> >>>>> "Do not go where the path may lead, >>>>> go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 3:48 PM Brian Bouterse <bbout...@redhat.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Great idea David! >>>>>> >>>>>> Once we get through tomorrow's mass-close, let's plan a transition to >>>>>> remove the Pulp3 tag and introduce a Pulp 2 tag instead. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:34 AM Dana Walker <dawal...@redhat.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dana Walker >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Software Engineer >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Red Hat >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <https://www.redhat.com> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:22 AM Daniel Alley <dal...@redhat.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I feel like using the Pulp 3 tag is suboptimal since we are closing >>>>>>>>> out most of our Pulp 2 issues and a majority of the new >>>>>>>>> bugs/tasks/stories >>>>>>>>> are for Pulp 3. Wouldn’t it make more sense to create a Pulp 2 tag >>>>>>>>> and use >>>>>>>>> it on the rare Pulp 2 issues that get filed? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Agreed, +1 to having a "Pulp 2" tag to replace the Pulp 3 tag. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:19 AM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I feel like using the Pulp 3 tag is suboptimal since we are >>>>>>>>> closing out most of our Pulp 2 issues and a majority of the new >>>>>>>>> bugs/tasks/stories are for Pulp 3. Wouldn’t it make more sense to >>>>>>>>> create a >>>>>>>>> Pulp 2 tag and use it on the rare Pulp 2 issues that get filed? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> David >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 8:27 AM Ina Panova <ipan...@redhat.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 to handle tag during the triage process >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -------- >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ina Panova >>>>>>>>>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Do not go where the path may lead, >>>>>>>>>> go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:53 PM Brian Bouterse < >>>>>>>>>> bbout...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 to Tanya's suggestion. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Also I have an action item to start a separate thread on how we >>>>>>>>>>> can plan-and-then-close all pulp2 bugs that we are not actively >>>>>>>>>>> working on. >>>>>>>>>>> I wanted to mention it here to identify it as a possible resolution >>>>>>>>>>> to this >>>>>>>>>>> issue since it was related. I'll send this today. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:54 AM Tatiana Tereshchenko < >>>>>>>>>>> ttere...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In my opinion, it's a part of triage or grooming process. >>>>>>>>>>>> Triage leader (for issues) and a person who grooms the task >>>>>>>>>>>> should pay attention to the tags. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tanya >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:47 PM David Davis < >>>>>>>>>>>> davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Looking in redmine at our current sprint, I see several issues >>>>>>>>>>>>> that don’t have Pulp 3 tag that should. Here are some: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4587 >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4587> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4595 >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4595> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4577 >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4577> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4576 >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4576> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4545 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4545>Talking with the QE team, >>>>>>>>>>>>> it’s difficult for them to get a feel for how much Pulp 2 vs Pulp >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3 work >>>>>>>>>>>>> there is. I guess we could try to get better about tagging issues >>>>>>>>>>>>> when we >>>>>>>>>>>>> create them? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> However, at least one issue is by someone outside the core >>>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp team and I am not sure community members will know to tag >>>>>>>>>>>>> their issues >>>>>>>>>>>>> w/ Pulp 3 tag. Are there any other alternatives to ensuring Pulp >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3 issues >>>>>>>>>>>>> get properly tagged? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> David >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
