On Feb 23, 12:39 pm, Luke Kanies <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Daniel wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Luke Kanies  
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On Feb 19, 2010, at 5:06 AM, Daniel wrote:
>
> >>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Luke Kanies <[email protected]
>
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>>> On Feb 17, 2010, at 1:49 PM, Daniel Kerwin wrote:
>
> >>>>> Hi list,
>
> >>>>> i wrote a simple type and provider to manage logical volumes with
> >>>>> puppet. This is my first attempt and it may not match the puppet
> >>>>> styles and best practices. I'm hoping for your improvement
> >>>>> suggestions.
>
> >>>> Hi Daniel,
>
> >>>> I don't quite have the remaining brainpower today to review your  
> >>>> code,
> >>>> but
> >>>> we're just about to publish an LVM module for managing physical  
> >>>> volumes,
> >>>> volume groups, logical volumes, and filesystems.  It doesn't have  
> >>>> the
> >>>> resizing built in like yours does, but it's otherwise pretty
> >>>> comprehensive.
> >>>>  It'd be great if we could join efforts.
>
> >>> Hi Luke,
>
> >>> thanks for your reply.
>
> >>> That sounds great. Is the code already publicly available? I'd be  
> >>> glad
> >>> to help you. Just let me know if there's anything i can do.
>
> >> We haven't published it yet, likely will next week.
>
> > Ok. If you're looking for an early adopter i can make some tests and
> > give you feedback.
>
> Ok, we've just published our LVM module:
>
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.txt
>
> As you'll see, there's a lot of overlap.
>
> We'll still be making some changes that we owe our customer, but I'd  
> definitely like to hear anything you'd like to see done differently.
>
> --
> A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a
> simple system that works. -- John Gaule
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Luke Kanies  -|-  http://reductivelabs.com  -|-   +1(615)594-8199

I've got a bit of a major concern with the filesystem type.  Mainly,
what would happen if the superblock on my filesystem went bad?  mount -
f --guess-fstype <dev> would presumably return that I don't have a
valid filesystem and before you know it, Puppet'd give me a nice shiny
new filesystem.

Perhaps if the filesystem type had one-shot functionality similar to
exec's refreshonly...

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.

Reply via email to