On 21/09/20 6:59 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:26:45AM +0400, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
I am thinking of proposing to name accepted PEPs as PAPs
namely: Python Accepted Proposals.
There's precedent for *not* doing that kind of thing.
"RFC" stands for "Request For Comment", and it stays that
way long after it has become adopted as a standard!
Personally, I don't think that encoding the acceptance status in the ID
is very useful. There's so much more about the PEP that doesn't get
encoded in the ID, like *what it is about*. For example, if somebody
mentioned PEP 450, or PAP 450, to me, I would have no clue what it was,
and I wrote it!
Maybe posts to the Python lists could be passed through a
filter that looks for PEP references and adds information to
them.
E.g. if someone typed "PEP 9876" into a post it might get
replaced by "PEP 9876 - Add turboencabulation module to stdlib
(Rejected)".
--
Greg
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/O7MO7EOUADTP3YDK3QS6ZUB2YVAKM5IV/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
