On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:13 AM Greg Ewing <greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > > > There's precedent for *not* doing that kind of thing. > "RFC" stands for "Request For Comment", and it stays that > way long after it has become adopted as a standard!
Maybe they have not thought of doing it and also, request for comments is like the first mail on python-ideas: > RFCs cover many aspects of computer networking, including protocols, > procedures, programs, and concepts, as well as meeting notes, opinions, and > sometimes humor PEPs are different. They are concrete documents with rationales, illustrations and now with sponsors > Maybe posts to the Python lists could be passed through a > filter that looks for PEP references and adds information to > them. > > E.g. if someone typed "PEP 9876" into a post it might get > replaced by "PEP 9876 - Add turboencabulation module to stdlib > (Rejected)". It would also be great to add member details like: Bumble Cee (Core dev)(61 201 karma) --- [1] https://www.ietf.org/standards/rfcs/ _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/4U3GNPH6OPX5J75QG2BTCJMMEXSF5CHJ/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
