On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 5:39 PM Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:13 AM Greg Ewing <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > There's precedent for *not* doing that kind of thing. > > "RFC" stands for "Request For Comment", and it stays that > > way long after it has become adopted as a standard! > > > Maybe they have not thought of doing it and also, request for comments is > like the first mail on python-ideas: > > > RFCs cover many aspects of computer networking, including protocols, > > procedures, programs, and concepts, as well as meeting notes, opinions, and > > sometimes humor > > PEPs are different. They are concrete documents with rationales, > illustrations and now > with sponsors >
Ah yes, there aren't any PEPs with opinions or humour, how silly to think that they're like RFCs. https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0628/ https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0404/ https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0401/ ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/ZJ3BUHOPO25JQ2GMEBEPQ34SDFB3GSIN/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
