Hello,

On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 16:41:36 +0000
David Mertz <me...@gnosis.cx> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 10:38 AM Paul Sokolovsky <pmis...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > And the const is the cheapest way to make Python a tad faster (for
> > sure open up possibilities for further optimizations), which should
> > be accessible even to such an old clumsy behemoth as CPython.
> >  
> 
> This is at least the 50th idea I've seen that will "with absolute
> certainty make Python faster" 

That's why I don't make such claims, and instead making a very
different one: that idea with absolute certainty will remove *one* of
50 problems which keep Python slow.

Hard-boiled pragmatists among us won't get it, but it's a true
intellectual pleasure to be left with 49 problems instead of 50.

Besides, if every advanced Python programmer peeled one of such
problems, before waving bye-bye and flying over to Haskell, we'd
already have a fast Python. In that regard, I continue a
well-established Python tradition. (And indeed, we have many fast
Pythons, working under various conditions. We still need to pull
further as a community to go over the summit where "a Python" is by
default "fast", not "slow").

> ... where the first 49 failed to do so,
> often despite significant institutional investment in money and
> skilled developers.
> 
> Obviously, there *have* been actual speed improvements.  But they
> rarely seem to follow the "obvious intuitions" of speculation on
> python-ideas.

Challenge accepted - let's on python-ideas speculate on actual speed
improvements, not wait with popcorn for "significant institutional
investment" (can do both).

> > > Somehow "dire" doesn't strike me as the right word.... Maybe you
> > > were looking for "conceivably useful in niche cases."?  
> >
> > Perhaps we can bargain on "really useful in many cases".
> >  
> 
> I've still yet to see an example that is very compelling.  Not speed,
> I'll treat that with skepticism. Just in terms of notably improved
> code clarity.

That's in the eye of the beholder, I'm afraid. So, if you don't want to
be convinced of those clarity improvements, you'll never be.


-- 
Best regards,
 Paul                          mailto:pmis...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/M5WFSMPX2NUWTV7XQDWNRUWTTAOAPQBJ/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to