On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 6:37 PM Paul Sokolovsky <pmis...@gmail.com> wrote: > A sufficiently smart JIT is sufficiently hard to develop. As an example, > a most well-known and most-used Python implementation, CPython, doesn't > have any JIT at all, not only "sufficiently advanced", but even > "simple". But simple would be much easier to add (to any project). And > my proposal explores how to get specific advantages from even simple JIT > techniques.
If all you're doing is exploring, why a PEP? Just create a "Python with constness" variant, and go to town. What's the advantage of having CPython and Jython and PyPy and everyone else synchronize on your proposed syntax? ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/5Z7NWD7ICTFN7MSDZGG4Z4IQ7MSPYGWY/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
