Hello, On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 18:39:42 +1100 Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 6:37 PM Paul Sokolovsky <pmis...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > A sufficiently smart JIT is sufficiently hard to develop. As an > > example, a most well-known and most-used Python implementation, > > CPython, doesn't have any JIT at all, not only "sufficiently > > advanced", but even "simple". But simple would be much easier to > > add (to any project). And my proposal explores how to get specific > > advantages from even simple JIT techniques. > > If all you're doing is exploring, why a PEP? Where's PEP? I informally once called my stuff "pseudo-PEP", to emphasize that it aspires to cover a topic in-depth, like expected from a PEP. But it's not fully written up to PEP standards, nor intended to be it. > Just create a "Python > with constness" variant, and go to town. What's the advantage of > having CPython and Jython and PyPy and everyone else synchronize on > your proposed syntax? Because all those things are "Pythons", and there should be exchange of ideas and cross-pollination between implementations, and what can be a better place for that, than a list called "python-ideas"? (Short of it being renamed to "cpython-ideas"). > > ChrisA [] -- Best regards, Paul mailto:pmis...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/3QWPZVEJ5Y7LO2IU5NFFJ3CJPZICB5MM/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
