On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 at 05:53, Random832 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023, at 16:41, Dom Grigonis wrote:
> > Would be interesting to see if my preference is an outlier or not really.
>
> I think this is a false dichotomy. We should consider VB-like conditional 
> expressions if(condition, when_true, when_false) as well.
>

Why? That sort of expression would be syntactically a function call,
which you can already create, but which would eagerly evaluate both
its arguments. The entire value of an actual conditional expression is
that it WON'T evaluate the expression it isn't using.

ChrisA
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/XCD7BX764Q7VZXICBX6PPHFSG3PZJPJ5/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to