On 16/07/18 21:16, Rhodri James wrote:
On 16/07/18 20:58, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/16/2018 1:27 PM, Jim Lee wrote:
90% of the world *is* "beneath my notice" when it comes to
programming for myself. I really don't care if that's not PC enough
for you.
Had you actually read my words with *intent* rather than *reaction*,
you would notice that I suggested the *option* of turning off
Unicode. I didn't say get *rid* of Unicode. I didn't say make it
*harder* to use Unicode. Once again - reaction rather than reading.
Obviously, the most vocal representatives of the Python community are
too sensitive about their language to enable rational discussion.
My empirical observation is that the more abrasive posters get
rewarded with more response, while my attempts to engage in rational
discussion, without ad hominems, gets less.
I wouldn't disagree with you. Fortunately Jim has pulled the "storming
off in a huff rather than answer a question anyone actually asked"
defence, so we can go back to debating about important things like how
to spell assignment expressions.
Oh wait... :-)
Cheeky :)
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list