On 10/17/25 06:11, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 at 21:12, Richard Henderson <[email protected]> wrote:Add the functions and update raw_accessors_invalid to match. Add assertions for !ARM_CP_128BIT in read_raw_cp_reg and write_raw_cp_reg.+__attribute__((unused)) +static void write_raw_cp_reg128(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, + Int128 v)Why does this one take an Int128 rather than a lo/hi pair?
I still represent the migration stream as Int128. See patches 12, 15, 16. r~
