On 5/27/2026 1:13 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Rather than adapting the array endianness when it it > filled, directly initialize the CODE words with the > correct endianness. > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]> > --- > hw/riscv/boot.c | 30 +++++++++++++----------------- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) >
One could argue original version is more readable. Any specific reason for rewriting things this way (performance, personal preference, other)? Not a blocker, just want to understand the original motivation. Reviewed-by: Pierrick Bouvier <[email protected]> Regards, Pierrick
