On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 06:19:40PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote: >> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 04:56:11PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote: >> >> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > The following changes since commit >> >> > 259d5577ae546de27e25a40710f81aa031660de8: >> >> > >> >> > lsi: Fix value overflow in request tag processing (2010-05-22 15:32:32 >> >> > +0200) >> >> > >> >> > are available in the git repository at: >> >> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/qemu.git pci >> >> > >> >> > Isaku Yamahata (4): >> >> > pci: clean up of pci_set_default_subsystem_id(). >> >> > pci: add const to pci_is_express(), pci_config_size(). >> >> > pci.h: remove unused constants. >> >> > msix: remove duplicated defines. >> >> > >> >> > Michael S. Tsirkin (1): >> >> > vhost: fix build broken by 0bfcd599e3f5c5679cc7d0165a0a1822e2f60de2 >> >> >> >> Nack, see 29f91781bd300b228d9c38b9f6c1e0b6a38f25fb. >> > >> > Did you follow the discussion about that patch before applying? >> > 29f91781bd300b228d9c38b9f6c1e0b6a38f25fb does not make sense >> > to me, I think it should be reverted. >> > we have long long value, let us just print with %ll. >> > casting to uint64 and printing with PRi64 is silly. >> >> We have PRI*64 just for this purpose, so let's use them. The >> discussion about that was earlier. > > Ho hum. As long as enough people got annoyed, there was hope that > debian will upodate their mingw port. I guess if everyone works around > this in code no one'll bother. Oh well, not important enough to care.
To make things even more annoying, mingw gcc from Debian stable (4.2.1-sjlj) gives no warnings, the warnings came from the updated compiler (4.4.2) of the future release. So we'll be stuck with the warnings for a looong time. :-(