On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: > Blue Swirl <blauwir...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 02:51:26PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>> On 05/30/2010 08:19 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: >>>>> We have PRI*64 just for this purpose, so let's use them. The >>>>> discussion about that was earlier. >>>> >>>> How does mingw matter for vhost-net specific code? >>>> >>>> Paolo >>> >>> Good point. That code is linux-only, so we are safe using %lld. >>> By the time someone ports vhost to windows, there's a chance >>> debian will update it's mingw. Blue Swirl? >> >> It's a good point, but there's also consistency: now no '%ll*' formats are >> used. > > If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Especially not when the fix is ugly.
Fully agree. But because beauty is in the eye of the beholder, our conclusions are probably different. ;-)
