Blue Swirl <blauwir...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 02:51:26PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 05/30/2010 08:19 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: >>>> We have PRI*64 just for this purpose, so let's use them. The >>>> discussion about that was earlier. >>> >>> How does mingw matter for vhost-net specific code? >>> >>> Paolo >> >> Good point. That code is linux-only, so we are safe using %lld. >> By the time someone ports vhost to windows, there's a chance >> debian will update it's mingw. Blue Swirl? > > It's a good point, but there's also consistency: now no '%ll*' formats are > used.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Especially not when the fix is ugly.
