On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 06:19:40PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote: > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 04:56:11PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote: > >> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> > >> wrote: > >> > The following changes since commit > >> > 259d5577ae546de27e25a40710f81aa031660de8: > >> > > >> > lsi: Fix value overflow in request tag processing (2010-05-22 15:32:32 > >> > +0200) > >> > > >> > are available in the git repository at: > >> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/qemu.git pci > >> > > >> > Isaku Yamahata (4): > >> > pci: clean up of pci_set_default_subsystem_id(). > >> > pci: add const to pci_is_express(), pci_config_size(). > >> > pci.h: remove unused constants. > >> > msix: remove duplicated defines. > >> > > >> > Michael S. Tsirkin (1): > >> > vhost: fix build broken by 0bfcd599e3f5c5679cc7d0165a0a1822e2f60de2 > >> > >> Nack, see 29f91781bd300b228d9c38b9f6c1e0b6a38f25fb. > > > > Did you follow the discussion about that patch before applying? > > 29f91781bd300b228d9c38b9f6c1e0b6a38f25fb does not make sense > > to me, I think it should be reverted. > > we have long long value, let us just print with %ll. > > casting to uint64 and printing with PRi64 is silly. > > We have PRI*64 just for this purpose, so let's use them. The > discussion about that was earlier.
Ho hum. As long as enough people got annoyed, there was hope that debian will upodate their mingw port. I guess if everyone works around this in code no one'll bother. Oh well, not important enough to care. -- MST
