On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 02:51:26PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> On 05/30/2010 08:19 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: >>> We have PRI*64 just for this purpose, so let's use them. The >>> discussion about that was earlier. >> >> How does mingw matter for vhost-net specific code? >> >> Paolo > > Good point. That code is linux-only, so we are safe using %lld. > By the time someone ports vhost to windows, there's a chance > debian will update it's mingw. Blue Swirl?
It's a good point, but there's also consistency: now no '%ll*' formats are used.
