Hi > On 30 Oct 2019, at 07:21, Matthias Kuhn <matth...@opengis.ch> wrote: > > Hi > > On 10/28/19 2:28 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote: >> >> Ok, >> >> Maybe, we just have to get used to this behavior, if this is, how other apps >> do it ... Still strange though to me. >> >> One issue though: what happens, if we revise the content of the news entry, >> just like we just did? Then the user has no chance in reading that revised >> version. >> > I don't follow this completely. How is a user supposed to know that he will > need to re-enable an item because it has been revised? > > If we don't get things right on first public release, I think we have to live > with the fact that some people will have never read this revised version. > > > I have no objections against having the possibility to reenable read items, > but I think we overestimate the importance because we tend to look at it from > a publisher/debugging and not an average user perspective.
Yes I think you are right - we (==me :-) ) just need to be careful when publishing news items, or unpublish and publish a new item if we want to make corrections…. Regards Tim > > > All the best, Matthias > > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer — Tim Sutton Co-founder: Kartoza Ex Project chair: QGIS.org Visit http://kartoza.com <http://kartoza.com/> to find out about open source: Desktop GIS programming services Geospatial web development GIS Training Consulting Services Skype: timlinux IRC: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net I'd love to connect. Here's my calendar link <https://calendly.com/timlinux> to make finding time easy.
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
