> > I really cannot imagine that a price of 45 pounds is unaffordable. > > One visit to a restaurant with your family is likely to be more > > expensive. > > > Bad example if you live in the US ;-) hehe (You can feed 4 for about > $20... mind you not a fancy restaurant but a lot of food nonetheless... > how do you think I got to be SOOOOO Huge? :-P) You don't live in flaming Rip-Off-Britain do you? (Though that doesn't seem to have helped me lose weight).
> Yes but why shell another $100 for Windoze? > It makes more sense to run QPC2 under WineX (as it requires DirectX.... or > maybe compile it with SDL or something ;-) so that compatibility is > ensured maybe even under FreeBSD/Linux?) There are such options available to those who know about them. The 'unknown' factor means people may be reluctant to try them, but the options are there. > Regardless, the fact of the matter is that QPC2 is a great piece of > software :-) Anyone who uses it regularly would agree with that as long as the proce is acceptable to them. At the end of the day it's choice...pay and get the best or use the (good) free options like QLay2 and uQLx and QDOS Classic. Dilwyn _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
