Malcolm Cadman wrote: > All useful features, and yet not having them doesn't prevent enjoying > the use.
As is often the case, good things you don't know you don't miss. Good things you do know however you never want to miss again. >>Opera 6 is how old? 5 years? Unlike IE, Opera HAS been improved in the >>meantime. They're at version 9 now. > Which is not comparing like for like. Well, it only makes sense to compare the most recent versions, doesn't it? I'd be a bit pissed if somebody says "QPC is not so good, it doesn't even run in a window. By the way, I'm using version 1.50". Also Opera 9 is completely free, no ads or anything anymore. > The Opera 6.04 [ free version ] that I am using says 2002, IE 6.0.29 [ > came with Windows XP Professional ] says 2004. > > So, one around 4 yrs old and the other around 2 yrs old. No, that is just the patch level, i.e. the last bug fix was 2 years old in your case. IE6 itself is 5 years old, I think. > PS ... Are you able to make to the Byfleet Show on 5th November 2006 ? No, I won't do any travelling this year due to work reasons. Marcel _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
