Marcel, would you be willing to share your modifications for QL-SD2? Dave
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 10:51 AM, pgraf--- via Ql-Users < ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com> wrote: > On 2 Feb 2018 at 16:25, Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users wrote: > > > Well, I said I'd do it and apparently I did it: > > > > https://www.kilgus.net/2018/02/02/clonetastic-ql-sd-clone- > working-with-goldcard-clone/ > > What surprises me is this: "With the original Verilog code my clone > didn't work at all, so it's definitely not just the different chip." > > With a normal GC, the original QL-SD worked relatively well, > compared to the SGC. On some GC systems it was even fully stable > hardware-wise. So if we assume that the electrical characteristics > of the XC9572 play a minor role, why did it not work _at_all_? > > A significant difference between Original GC and Tetroid? > > Peter > > _______________________________________________ > QL-Users Mailing List > -- Dave Park d...@sinclairql.com _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List
