> >Ok, so admittedly, you have to know machine code for this, but > >still, the QL machine code is not so difficult. > Yes indeed. My first foray into m/c was the 6502 with all sorts of > weird addressing modes that I never fully understood. It was my lecturer's uncertainty in the indirect modes of addressing that meant that my first year micro project at university was to get a Commodore Pet to calculate 2**3000 (every digit). I loved the 6502 with (what I'd consider to be) its semi-risc architecture: 3 internal registers (AXY), 256 (pairable) external "registers" (zero page), syncronous memory accessing, pipelining (resulting in small number of clock cycles per instruction)...oh such memories...
- Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Wolfgang Lenerz
- RE: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Norman Dunbar
- RE: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Marcel Kilgus
- Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Malcolm Cadman
- Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Tony Firshman
- Re: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Tony Firshman
- Re: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Tony Firshman
- Re: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Robert Newson
- Re: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Dilwyn Jones
- Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Dilwyn Jones
- Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Timothy Swenson
- Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Timothy Swenson
- Re: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Geoff Wicks
- Re: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Malcolm Cadman
- Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Timothy Swenson
- RE: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Arvid Borretzen
- Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL Malcolm Cadman