On 24 Mar 2001, at 11:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You may be right that you cannot trust Windoze or some of its programs. > But what is a "trusted" SMSQ/E browser worth, if the data flows on the > basis of QPC and the underlying "untrusted" M$ Windoze? 1 - I trust QOC 2 - I trust Windows, at least in that sense: Windows itself doesn't interfere with the browser. 3 - I'd ALSO love to have an Q60 with a Ql browser. Fair enough? Wolfgang
- Re: [ql-users] New Hyper Browse release Mills
- Re: [ql-users] New Hyper Browse release Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: [ql-users] New Hyper Browse release cgraf
- Re: [ql-users] New Hyper Browse release cgraf
- Re: [ql-users] New Hyper Browse release Bill Waugh
- Re: [ql-users] New Hyper Browse release Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] New Hyper Browse release P Witte
- Re: [ql-users] New Hyper Browse release Arnould Nazarian
- Re: [ql-users] New Hyper Browse release Richard Zidlicky
- RE: [ql-users] New Hyper Browse release Norman Dunbar
- Re: [ql-users] New Hyper Browse release Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: [ql-users] New Hyper Browse release Peter Graf