Per wrote: >There seem to be some problems with floating point numbers on SMSQ/E >(2.98) > >First of all, entering numbers between 2E308 and 9E308 crash Sbasic! > >[snip] Another Intel Pentium bug? ;-) No problem with Q40 and Q60 under SMSQ/E 2.98. I never liked the idea of converting essential parts of SMSQ/E to Intel x86 code, but I guess it has happened here. Maybe this is another reason to stick with 68K code. Peter
- [ql-users] float P Witte
- Re: [ql-users] float John Hitchcock
- Re: [ql-users] float Marcel Kilgus
- RE: [ql-users] float Norman Dunbar
- RE: [ql-users] float Claude Mourier 00
- Re: [ql-users] float Peter Graf
- Re: [ql-users] float P Witte
- Re: [ql-users] float Marcel Kilgus
- Re: [ql-users] float Richard Zidlicky
- Re: [ql-users] float Marcel Kilgus
- Re: [ql-users] float Richard Zidlicky
- Re: [ql-users] float Marcel Kilgus
- RE: Re: [ql-users] float Ian . Pine
- Re: [ql-users] float Peter Graf
- Re: [ql-users] float Marcel Kilgus
- Re: [ql-users] float P Witte