Re: [ql-users] Interesting Site

[Dexter]

On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, ZN wrote:

> the PCB design leaves a LOT to be desired. It seems that whoever did it is
> not very experienced. IMHO the board could have been 2/3 or even half the
> size.

The designer actually said on the site that it was a prototype board and
wasn't optimized for size or cost, and that they could easily reduce the
size by that amount...

Just being fair...

Does anyone here have any experience with Eagle v4? What package do you
folks over at Q60 HQ use?

Dave