Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 04:02:20PM +0300, Mike Jackson wrote:
> > I have had bad experiences with OpenLDAP in terms of memory leakage and
> > replication crashing,
>
> You've done something wrong. OpenLDAP 1.2.11 runs very solid for us (on
> OpenBSD).
These are all related to 2.0.x, but there are more if you search
further.
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-bugs/200106/msg00037.html
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-bugs/200106/msg00046.html
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-bugs/200104/msg00028.html
> > Replication sucks on OpenLDAP.
>
> It works like a charm for us.
http://www.openldap.org/software/release/changes.html talks about slurpd
buffer overflow in 2.0.x.
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-bugs/199905/msg00010.html
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/199909/msg00080.html
Replication will not work if you don't build multi-threaded.
Multi-threading with OpenLDAP is the cause of most crashes and
replication problems.
> OpenLDAP 1.2.11 has no memory leaks. I usually have it running for more than
> half a year before it is restarted.
There are known memory leaks. It may not leak on OpenBSD for whatever
particular reason, but various OS's experience leaks.
> Mike, your experiences may be true on Solaris - but who want's to implement
> a big mail system on such a broken OS?
Heh! Not me, but you know the story...
Regards,
Mike
