On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 05:16:44PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Henning Brauer wrote: > > Clustering is a bit misleading for this qmail-ldap technique. You want a big > > NetApps Filer and mount the users maildirs on each machine via NFS. > NetApp Filer is too expensive for us right now, but we'll probably buy > one if the system grows :) Big systems cost big money. The only alternative is a BSD based filer. Linux NFS is, eh, .. wel, you get the idea. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
- RE: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Graham Leggett
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Graham Leggett
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Henning Brauer
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Henning Brauer
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Mike Jackson
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Henning Brauer
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Henning Brauer
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Graham Leggett
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Henning Brauer
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Henning Brauer
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Dan Melomedman
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Karl Pitrich
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Dan Melomedman
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
