>Sorry, must have missed that part. It was NOT easy extracting what >had changed in the FULL patch I was sent! Next time, just do a patch >between MY patch and YOUR changes (ie, I _only_ want YOUR changes >not mine as well!).
OK, Next time I will do in that way. >> BTW, I think it may be a good idea to add a "ldapObjectClass" >> attribute into qmailControl.schema file, because it's useful >> in some case. > >Why and in what cases? Yes, it may not be used in most cases, but full mapping from qmail-ldap control files into qmailControl object's attributes is reasonable. ( I use ldapobjectclass because in my ldap tree some ou's mailaddresses is same as some users' ) > >New patch that fixes the first problem is at > >http://qmail.bayour.com/patches_ldap/qmail-ldap-control_20021126.gz > >Don't forget to use 'patch -p2', not 'patch -p1' when applying the patch! Your patch is very good, but as a novice, I have been suffering in using it. I think it is worth spending a little time cleaning it. If you should concentrate on other more important things about it, you can find a volunteer do it for you. If was I not in hunting job, I will happy to do it for you.
