For what it's worth, I would be happy to help or to provide the patches I've already created...
- Jason
On Tuesday, Nov 26, 2002, at 13:25 US/Eastern, Jason Parsons wrote:
Why don't the folks that own qmail-ldap roll in the qmail-ldap-control patch? It seems logical; many people use both patches, and they can be enabled or disabled with Makefile defines. That way, qmail-ldap and qmail-ldap-control won't be out of sync every month.
The SMTP AUTH patch would also be very handy...
- Jason
On Tuesday, Nov 26, 2002, at 12:57 US/Eastern, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
Oh, that. 'Not my problem' (ie, can't be bothered to fix it). If people have
problem with ONE reject, they will NEVER be happy. I don't consider it being
such a big deal.
