Quoting Jason Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Why don't the folks that own qmail-ldap roll in the qmail-ldap-control
> patch? It seems logical; many people use both patches, and they can
> be enabled or disabled with Makefile defines. That way, qmail-ldap
> and qmail-ldap-control won't be out of sync every month.
This won't happen. It's been on my and many with me's agenda for two
years (or more?).
> The SMTP AUTH patch would also be very handy...
I do this in my Debian GNU/Linux package.
patches/000_qmailqueue
patches/001_netscape-progress
patches/002_qmail-link-sync
patches/003_qmail-smtpd-bmtpatch
patches-ldap/001d_qmail-ldap-1.03-20021101
patches-ldap/0000_big-todo
patches-ldap/001a_remove_for_qmail-ldap_qmail-pop3d
patches-ldap/002a_qmail-ldap-control_20021126
patches-ldap/001b_create_emtpy_files_needed_for_qmail-ldap
patches-ldap/003a_smtp-auth-20020501a
patches-ldap/001c_remove_for_qmail-ldap_qmail-smtpd
patches-ldap/004a_rblfix-qmail-smtpd.c
patches-ldap/004c_virtual_users
patches-ldap/005a_makefile_options
Added in the order you see here.
--
attack bomb $400 million in gold bullion terrorist Clinton munitions
Saddam Hussein critical genetic Ft. Bragg spy toluene FBI FSF Honduras
[See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this]
