On 04-Jan-99 01:39:33, Paul Gregg wrote something about "Re: qmail II request". I just
couldn't help replying to it, thus:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> Since I started this thread I can tell you without question what it's about
>> and [EMAIL PROTECTED] isn't any part of it. I want to reject mail being
>> sent to certain valid usernames, such as my database. I'd also like to
>> bounce some mail to nonvalid usernames without accepting and bouncing
>> afterward since they only double bounce anyway.
> To do this, then it requires qmail-smtpd to know everything that qmail-send
> does.
Not at all. Try rereading the message that started this thread. The same
mechanism that works for control/badmailfrom will do the trick.
> If you are in control of the local delivery then you already can control
> who sends mail to your database. Why can't you use procmail?
No good. Then you have already accepted the message, and the point was to
reject it.
Regards,
/ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻTŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ\
| Rask Ingemann Lambertsen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Registered Phase5 developer | WWW: http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c948374/ |
| A4000, 775 kkeys/s (RC5-64) | "ThrustMe" on XPilot and EFnet IRC |
| If you had an off switch, Doctor, would you not keep it secret? |
