Pavel Kankovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: > >> To start with, you have to do a HUGE number of extra DNS >> lookups to determine what the recipient systems ARE. > >As opposed to the "one SMTP transaction per remote recipient" strategy >that is able to deliver messages without the need to figure out what the >recipient systems are? Intriguing. :) Say you send a message to a list of 10,000 addresses using sendmail. What's the first thing it does? It looks up the MX for each recipient so it can sort by MX and minimize the number of connections. qmail, on the other hand, fires off concurrencyremote qmail-remotes and starts delivery immediately. I think Postfix just sorts by FQDN, so it doesn't have to do 10,000 DNS lookups before it starts delivering. But by doing that, it potentially misses a lot of combining for different FQDN's with the same MX. -Dave
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Sam
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Russell Nelson
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Jason Haar
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Andy Bradford
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Jeff Hayward
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Eric Dahnke
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Russell Nelson
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Frank Tegtmeyer
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Dave Sill
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Dave Sill
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic David L. Nicol
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic John White
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic John White
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Steve Vertigan
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Dave Sill
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Stefan Paletta
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Sam
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Dave Sill