Steve Vertigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Dave Sill wrote: > >> Say you send a message to a list of 10,000 addresses using >> sendmail. What's the first thing it does? It looks up the MX for each >> recipient so it can sort by MX and minimize the number of connections. > >Why is that? Lets say you have to deliver to [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] and >[EMAIL PROTECTED] Why wouldn't a well-written mta assume that the MX for >aol.com is most likely going to be the same as for aol.com, and aol.com? If >the MX lookup is done after sorting by domain wouldn't that reduce dns >traffic? Of course, I didn't mean to imply that identical FQDN's needed multiple lookups. -Dave
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Frank Tegtmeyer
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Dave Sill
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Dave Sill
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic David L. Nicol
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic John White
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic John White
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Steve Vertigan
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Dave Sill
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Stefan Paletta
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Sam
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Dave Sill
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Dave Sill
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Sam
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Russell Nelson
- Big DNS-patch also for t-online.de required Frank Tegtmeyer
- Re: Big DNS-patch also for t-online.de requ... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Big DNS-patch also for t-online.de requ... Frank Tegtmeyer
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic David Dyer-Bennet