Pavel Kankovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Indeed. But are there any EXTRA lookups done? ("Extra" is the keyword >here...read original DDB's text again.) > >The answer is: NO unless the implementation is incredibly stupid. Like sendmail? :-) Sendmail is notorious for unnecessary DNS lookups. >> I think Postfix just sorts by FQDN, so it doesn't have to do 10,000 >> DNS lookups before it starts delivering. But by doing that, it >> potentially misses a lot of combining for different FQDN's with the >> same MX. > >"A lot" being a speculation or based on real-world data? <evil grin> I don't need real-world data to know that there are lots of MX's that serve multiple FQDN's. And I did say "potentially". -Dave
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Jason Haar
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Andy Bradford
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Jeff Hayward
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Eric Dahnke
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Russell Nelson
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Frank Tegtmeyer
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Dave Sill
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Dave Sill
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic David L. Nicol
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic John White
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic John White
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Steve Vertigan
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Dave Sill
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Stefan Paletta
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Sam
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Dave Sill
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Dave Sill
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Sam