On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 06:50:11PM +0200, Milen Petrinski wrote:
> Sorry, the previous was not complete, here it is:
>
> Nov 29 15:53:17 be-01 qmail: 975513197.754397 new msg 101388
> Nov 29 15:53:17 be-01 qmail: 975513197.754867 info msg 101388: bytes 627
> from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 5060 uid 1001
> Nov 29 15:53:18 be-01 qmail: 975513198.117625 starting delivery 38: msg
> 101388 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, qmail is going to deliver message 101388 to local address
bates.eu.com-mpetrinski.
> Nov 29 15:53:18 be-01 qmail: 975513198.118082 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
> Nov 29 15:53:21 be-01 qmail: 975513201.444056 new msg 101743
> Nov 29 15:53:21 be-01 qmail: 975513201.444555 info msg 101743: bytes 749
> from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 5149 uid 1011
> Nov 29 15:53:21 be-01 qmail: 975513201.444876 starting delivery 39: msg
> 101743 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Something messed up the local address here for this message.
> Nov 29 15:53:21 be-01 qmail: 975513201.445124 status: local 2/10 remote 0/20
> Nov 29 15:53:21 be-01 qmail: 975513201.677352 new msg 102149
> Nov 29 15:53:21 be-01 qmail: 975513201.686915 info msg 102149: bytes 749
> from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 5157 uid 1011
> Nov 29 15:53:21 be-01 qmail: 975513201.702107 starting delivery 40: msg
> 102149 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Nov 29 15:53:21 be-01 qmail: 975513201.710230 status: local 3/10 remote 0/20
Ok, qmail is going to deliver message 102149 to local address
bates.eu.com-office.
> Nov 29 15:53:21 be-01 qmail: 975513201.988794 delivery 38: success:
> did_0+0+1/
> Nov 29 15:53:21 be-01 qmail: 975513201.997266 status: local 2/10 remote 0/20
> Nov 29 15:53:22 be-01 qmail: 975513202.005094 end msg 101388
Okay, message 101388 has been delivered to all recipients and has been
removed from the system (note that this message number may be reused
later). But if the .qmail for bates.eu.com-mpetrinski had any
forwarding lines the line "delivery xx: success" would include
something like "qp_3511" indicating that for forwarded mail
qmail-queue pid 3511 was invoked. But the qp_ note is missing here,
one can't be sure precisely where messages 101743 and 102149 came
from.
> Nov 29 15:53:27 be-01 qmail: 975513207.584003 delivery 39: success:
> POP_user_does_not_exist,_but_will_deliver_to_/home/vpopmail/do
> mains/bates.eu.com/postmaster/did_0+0+1/
> Nov 29 15:53:27 be-01 qmail: 975513207.584618 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
> Nov 29 15:53:27 be-01 qmail: 975513207.584919 end msg 101743
> Nov 29 15:53:27 be-01 qmail: 975513207.721129 delivery 40: success:
> did_0+0+1/
> Nov 29 15:53:27 be-01 qmail: 975513207.721590 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
> Nov 29 15:53:27 be-01 qmail: 975513207.721865 end msg 102149
Still insufficient information. Please post the output of:
1. /var/qmail/bin/qmail-showctl
2. cat /var/qmail/users/assign
3. /var/qmail/bin/qmail-getpw bates.eu.com-mpetrinski | xargs -0 echo
4. The .qmail file that governs deliveries for the local address
bates.eu.com-mpetrinski, if you can find it. When posting, be sure to
include the full path and filename of the .qmail file you are posting,
so we can double check to see if you got the right one.
PGP signature
