On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 05:36:13AM -0600, Ken Jones wrote: > Wayne Chu wrote: > > > > I feel our discussion starts to become OT. > > I tried to be calm and I won't discuss it any more after this. > > Obviously this is a hot topic for you. > > So, without furthre evidence, you are obviously a person > who will exploit the edge of spam related email. > > I have a question for you Sir. > > Are you going to be sending these "emails" to your local > list of accounts. Or will this be going out to other > lists? > > How have you received these lists of emails? I have a suggestion for you: stop busting this guy's balls unless you can prove he is sending unsolicited bulk mail.
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... Mark Delany
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynami... Wayne Chu
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... Ken Jones
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... Jenny Holmberg
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... Ken Jones
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... Jenny Holmberg
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... Ken Jones
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... Wayne Chu
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... Ken Jones
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... Amitai Schlair
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... Alex Pennace
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... cfm
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings David L. Nicol
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings asantos
- RE: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings Henry, Casa
- RE: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings Collin B. McClendon