> > PINE may be limited, but it sure is useful as a quick and dirty > > console-base MUA. I figured out how to use in in about 3 minutes > > without having to RTFM. > > If you've ever had to deal with the code, dirty is definitely an accurate > description. Well, yes. I once tried to hack just pico, and gave up in disgust. weemacs??? OK, on your advice I will look into mutt and give it a whirl, but god knows I have better things to do with my time than evaluate MUA's. But then I can't be closed minded....Thanks. --Pete
- [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus malibox) Henning Brauer
- Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus mal... Adam McKenna
- Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus... Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir ve... James R Grinter
- Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildi... Adam McKenna
- Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: M... Peter Cavender
- Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (wa... Russ Allbery
- Re: [OT] pine and Maildir... Peter Cavender
- Re: [OT] pine and Maildir... Mahlon Smith
- Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: M... James R Grinter
- Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus mal... Piotr Kasztelowicz
- Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus mal... Adam McKenna
- Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus... tc lewis
- Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir ve... Alex Pennace
- Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildi... tc lewis
- Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: M... Alex Pennace
- Re: [OT] pine and Maildir Robin S. Socha
- Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus mal... Piotr Kasztelowicz