>> I can't imagine why Creator couldn't guess at a default value anyway; >> just ask QThreadPool what the ideal number of threads is. :P > > Actually I can't imagine why make couldn't guess at a default value by > checking the number of cores :P > > (Our little project ibjom, a replacement for nmake on Windows, does exactly > that.)
But isn't that what QThread::idealThreadCount() DOES? :P > Doesn't make automatically use all available cores if the 'j' argument is not > set? I'm sure I read that somewhere. Nooooo, without specifying an argument it runs as many parallel tasks as possible, limited only by dependency tracking. Good way to choke a system. Not a mistake I'll make twice. /s/ Adam _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
