Are the mattresses mentioned (Selectair mattresses, tempurpedic) able to
have the head and feet raised and lowered?  Like on a typical hospital bed.


On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 9:54 PM, RONALD L PRACHT <r.pra...@sbcglobal.net>wrote:

> tempurpedic adjustable 4 me for the past 10 yrs.............its my best
> friend I never had
>
> ron
>    *From:* Aaron Mann <aman...@gmail.com>
> *To:* "wheelch...@aol.com" <wheelch...@aol.com>
> *Cc:* kelra...@gmail.com; quad-list <quad-list@eskimo.com>
> *Sent:* Sunday, January 26, 2014 10:51 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [QUAD-L] SelectAir air mattress
>
> Selectair mattresses only adjust the hardness and temperature of the bed.
> It would definitely be a step up from your foam mattress.  The air beds
> that are being mentioned by others here are low-loss, which typically are
> prescribed overlays or complete mattress systems.  I could see a low-loss
> on a Selectair being quite comfortable. Don't confuse this with a sleep
> number mattress...
>
>
> Aaron Mann
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:06 PM, <wheelch...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>  Hiya  Raymond !  Welcome.
>
> Best Wishes
>
>  In a message dated 1/25/2014 4:53:56 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> kelra...@gmail.com writes:
>
>  Hello, I am a C3/4 complete quadriplegic. I have been sleeping on a foam
> mattress for years without a problem, but I recently got a chance to try
> out a SelectAir air mattress.I was offer this mattress secondhand for free
> and I have heard how air mattresses are supposed to be better for us
> quadriplegics so I figured I should give it a try. The main problem I seem
> to have with it is that I could not keep warm enough. For some reason I had
> to put a lot more blankets over me to warm me up on the air mattress then
> on the foam mattress. I am just writing wondering if anybody on this list
> uses that type air mattress and have had the same problem? While I am
> writing, I am wondering what other people who use that mattress used for
> sheets.
>
> Thank you very much in advance for any information you could offer me
> about this.
> Raymond Kelly
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to