Nostalgia is a wonderful thing. (Capri's rule - oops did i say that out loud :-o)

Gary
Q and Capri less

On 16/05/2011 01:03, cormorant wrote:
Odd isn't it really? My previous car was a Morris Minor - prone to
hideous amounts of concealed corrosion, no boot space, cruising speed
60mph, yes easy diy and cheap bits but only 40mpg - my diesel mk2
saloon does 60mpg and doesn't rust and massive boot and more comfort -
80mph all day - a decent Minor costs at least £1500 and even then you
are not sure of the bodywork - a decent mk2 saloon half of that. Loads
of Minors around and only 250ish  Quantum saloons

On May 15, 10:49 am, Derek Clews<derek_cl...@lineone.net>  wrote:
I subscribe to the Eddie philosophy, if we can get the mechanical parts supply sorted then we have an infinitely lifed (it doesn't rust) DIY car. You will not be able to buy such a thing from now on, DIY has gone. That will place the Q's with successful classics such as MGB's and Moggy Thou's on the 'keepable' scale and very useable still. Such a placement into, e.g. Practical Classics, listings would start to increase the values. Its about recognition. See it - want it!

Our donor cars are now getting these listings and some kit cars are, so maybe the club should be trying for the same with our Q's?

Derek

On 15 May 2011, at 07:14, Rolf wrote:







Agree with you. Just some loose thoughts:
Had the same experience, tried to sell my saloon for a reasonable
price, but no decent offer, but I kept it for time being. Now my 2+2
is on the road, I might sell it for whatever comes up, or leave it in
the garage. For now, the cost of having two cars on the road are not
sky high, but lack of space is a downside.
At the same time, due to having two Quantums on the drrive, people
stare and hurt necks, trying to see the cars when they drive by and
recently a guy came up to me to talk about the car at 7.30 am!
So we defenately need people's interest i the cars what helps and take
the cars out as much as we can. (says daily driver)
What can we do to increase publicity?
On 14 mei, 22:10, Rob Dale<tlmsupers...@yahoo.com>  wrote:
Mr clarkson like him or not i reckon if top gear had a feature on a kitcar company each week they could almost relaunch the UK small builders car market as is his power with petrolheads. One guy complained to me saying that the price of my car was to high saying he had got one for £600 , i said well done . Im in no rush to sell my car so i guess im in a strong selling position , but looking around the market i really don't why kitcars should be going down in value so much even good versions as it not like are fords vauxhalls etc and they are thousands of the same one kicking around. All i can think is that it must be down to the people selling them. Also now theres another quantum owner up here i may keep it and we could go for 2 car rallies ,3 if we let my brother come along in his silva fury. --- On Sat, 14/5/11, Dave the Subbie<dave_the_sub...@hotmail.com> wrote:
From: Dave the Subbie<dave_the_sub...@hotmail.com>
Subject: [Quantum Owners] Re: Just put my Quantum on ebay
To: "Quantum Owners Group"<quantumowners@googlegroups.com>
Date: Saturday, 14 May, 2011, 19:53
Anything is only worth what you can
get for it, but that depends on
how desparate you are to sell it.
The truth is that a Mk2 without MoT is going to have to be
pretty
special to make more than £300 - 400, and a 2+2 £600 -
700. With MoT
and tax, you could say the same cars would be £700 - 800
and £1000
-1500. I've bought three and sold one in the last year.
(Don't ask..!)
The above are governed, largely, by the alternatives on the
wider
market. Mx5s, MGFs, MR2s, XR2s, etc. etc. and the number of
people
with a non-runner kit car in the garage that they have lost
interest
in. Often that they bought second hand and didn't build.
Now, the problem for most of us is that, having spent hours
and money
on our cars, their open market value is such that we won't
get it back
if we sell them. Which is why most of the best cars aren't
for sale. I
guess that's a fact of life.
But it leaves the problem that, if your car gets written
off, the only
way to replace it is to buy a less special one and do lots
of work to
it to get it to the same standard. Which is why we need
agreed value
insurance. to cover the work involved. And particularly if
it's
someone else's fault - when you would be really annoyed to
be offered
the sort of money above for your immaculate 2+2 turbo 4wd
nitrous
injection with electric hood, kangaroo leather interior and
diamond
jewelled instruments, etc. (Don't tell me someone has
one..!)
The other problem is that, having built the ultimate car,
it's not
possible to sell it on to finance the next project. Or
persuade other
stakeholders in the household that you aren't just throwing
good money
after bad every month.
So, ultimately, we all have an interest in improving the
profile of
these cars in the wider world. When rusty heaps of MGBs
with
agricultural engines and suspension are £2K+ and Mk1
Escorts start at
£4K for a 1.1 4-door, there has to be scope for our chosen
vehicles to
be worth more, if only the wider market appreciated them.
It's not
just Quantums - look at early GTMs, Mini Marcos, Ginettas,
Novas, etc.
They all have the same problem.
I don't know the answer, but, as a relative newby to the
scene, it
seems to me that there is scope for a gentle but effective
publicity
campaign to bring the attention of the wider enthusiast
market to our
area. There's both the Classic area, that must be getting
bored with
the same old cars by now, and seems to be getting more
into
modifications, which we do lots of, and there's the Top
Gear market,
that must be getting bored with looking at unaffordable,
uninsurable
supercars, whilst driving korean superminis on HP, with
4-figure
insurance premiums.
More interest = more buyers = better values for our cars?
There, I've thrown a brick into the pond. What do you
think?
Dave.
On May 13, 1:18 pm, Doug<doughoward...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
"...isn't anything only worth what someone else is
prepared to pay for
it?"
Yes, but what governs what someone is prepared to pay
for it?  Is it
what buyers are prepared to pay, or what sellers are
asking for it?  I
guess it's more of a buyers market at the moment, but
for something
like an Xtreme with a fairly good USP demand will
probably not be too
dependent on whether the average asking price for a
typical one is £5k
or £7k.  If you want one you want one, and you'll
pay what the going
rate is SO LONG AS YOU DON'T SEE VALUES FALLING, and
owners and buyers
alike value the cars by looking at what prices they
are for sale at.
Please argue the point if you think I'm wrong.  The
trouble is that by
chasing buyers by starting out asking less than
everyone else for your
own car, not only does it force all the values down,
it may also
(conversely) reduce demand as buyers see resale values
are falling,
which in turn reduces values, and so on.  It seems a
vicious cycle and
we don't want to get into that.
Falling secondhand values also reduce demand for new
builds, since no
one want's to spend a fortune on building a car only
to find the
average resale value after a few years of minimal use
is half that.
So obviously it's in the interest of Quantum and
quantum owners to
keep values up, and hence talk of agreed value schemes
which might
support values a bit.
At the end of the day all kit cars are unique, and if
you happen to
have the particular features someone wants then that's
more likely to
determine whether it's your car they buy or the other
chap's,
providing the buyers can see why your car might be a
bit more or less
than someone elses.  Undercutting the competition
ends up being bad
for all the current owners, but if you need to in
order to sell in a
hurry then that's what you have to do.  It's when a
new one comes on
for sale at what seems an artificially low price that
I baulk because
the seller didn't even try to find out if it would
sell at a higher
price.  I guess in the end values will find a level,
I just hope it's
not too low.  Mine's on PH now by the way.  Decide
for yourselves if
I'm asking too much.
Regards
Doug
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "Quantum Owners Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group 
athttp://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en
IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is
provided on an "As Is" basis, without warranty or the
implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the
individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in
the preparation of the above information shall have any
liability to any person or entity with respect to liability,
loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or
indirectly by the instructions contained within this or
related message(s).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quantum Owners Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group 
athttp://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en
IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As Is" basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage
...

read more »

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quantum 
Owners Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en

IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As Is" 
basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor 
the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the 
above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to 
liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the 
instructions contained within this or related message(s).

Reply via email to